Bush vs gore

These men and women of our Armed Forces should be able to expect as much and no less, because of their induction into military service, than those of us who remain at home pursuing normal activities. Of particular relevance [17] to this case was the so-called " safe harbor " provision, which allows states to appoint their electors without Congressional interference if done by a Bush vs gore deadline: On December 9, in a 5—4 decision, the U.

As court challenges were issued over the legality of hand recounts in select counties, Bush vs gore stories were filled with the arcane Bush vs gore of the election judge. It is confidence in the men and women who administer the judicial system that is the true backbone of the rule of law.

It would require not only the adoption after opportunity for argument of adequate statewide standards for determining what is a legal vote, and practicable procedures to implement them, but also orderly judicial review of any disputed matters that might arise.

The Court held that the Equal Protection Clause guarantees to individuals that their ballots cannot Bush vs gore devalued by "later arbitrary and disparate treatment". The formulation of uniform rules to determine intent based on these recurring circumstances is practicable and, we conclude, necessary.

The reason for the manual recount was the result of malfunctioning ballot machines and the suspicion that some of the members of the ballot counting committee were not being honest in their attempts to tally the votes.

Louise Weinberg argues that, even giving the Court the benefit of the doubt that it acted appropriately in intervening in Florida state law, its actions should be deemed unconstitutional because its intervention was not coupled with any kind of remedy aimed at determining the actual outcome of the election.

Supreme Court ruled in the case of Bush v. In the month following the election, some 50 individual suits were filed concerning the various counts, recounts, and certification deadlines. Constitution does not specifically disallow a president and a vice president from the same state, it does prohibit electors from casting both of his or her votes for persons from his or her own state.

Networks initially projected Gore the winner in Florida, but later they declared that Bush had opened an insurmountable lead. On the national stage, Bush was portrayed in the media as the establishment candidate.

It suffices to say that the issuance of the stay suggests that a majority of the Court, while not deciding the issues presented, believe that the petitioner has a substantial probability of success. Much of the controversy seems to revolve around ballot cards designed to be perforated by a stylus but which, either through error or deliberate omission, have not been perforated with sufficient precision for a machine to count them.

This was cheating, and a violation of the judicial oath. The per curiam opinion in Bush v. The press of time does not diminish the constitutional concern.

There is no difference between the two sides of the present controversy on these basic propositions. The consortium examinedballots that vote-counting machines had rejected. Bush asked former Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney to head up a team to help select a running mate for him, but ultimately, Bush decided that Cheney himself should be the vice presidential nominee.

History has now favored the voter, and in each of the several States the citizens themselves vote for Presidential electors. The endorsement of that position by the majority of this Court can only lend credence to the most cynical appraisal of the work of judges throughout the land.

Print and broadcast media cited often contradictory exit-polling numbers, and the races in Oregon and New Mexico would remain too close to call for some days.

The petition presents the following questions: Because it is evident that any recount seeking to meet the December 12 date will be unconstitutional for the reasons we have discussed, we reverse the judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida ordering a recount to proceed. That order did not specify who would recount the ballots.

Jerry Falwell and televangelist Pat Robertson as "agents of intolerance", a term he would later distance himself from during his bid.On November 8,the day following the Presidential election, the Florida Division of Elections reported that petitioner, Governor Bush, had received 2, votes, and respondent, Vice President Gore, had received 2, votes, a margin of 1, for Governor Bush.

Bush v. Gore, case in which, on December 12,the Supreme Court of the United States reversed a Florida Supreme Court request for a selective manual recount of that state’s U.S. presidential election ballots.

The 5–4 decision effectively awarded Florida’s 25 votes in the electoral college—and thus the election itself—to Republican candidate George W. Bush. Following the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Bush ultimedescente.com Beach County Canvassing Board, and concurrent with Vice President Al Gore's contest of the certification of Florida presidential election results, on December 8, the Florida Supreme Court ordered that the Circuit Court in Leon County tabulate by hand contested ballots from Miami-Dade County.

Bush v. Gore

Bush v. Gore, U.S.


98 (), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court that settled a recount dispute in Florida's presidential election. The ruling was issued on December 12, On December 9, the Court had preliminarily halted the Florida recount that was occurring. After Bush v. Gore, the concern was that the Court had not only overreached itself but undermined its authority by not speaking with one voice.

That split decision,suggested that Bush v. Gore was a political, not a judicial, decision.

United States presidential election, 2000

Precedents. Bush v. The case of Bush v. Gore is very famous, for it had a great effect on the presidential election. The Bush v. Gore case occurred because the presidential election of faced a very serious problem.

Bush vs gore
Rated 4/5 based on 93 review